There's something that's been bothering me off and on for a few weeks. It's been in my head since the snafu in
maladaptive's LJ, where
luna_hoshino got into a tizzy of some sort because no one else though Aeris and Yuna were particularly strong feminist characters. At some point the "women in refrigerators" phenomenon was mentioned, and someone said that Aeris's death was solely to make Cloud's struggle against Sephiroth even more personal (though why it needed to be I have no idea), and that if Barret had died instead, it would have had the same effect on the group.
Now, I am not saying that I disagree with this. I don't tend to really dwell on issues like this, partly because it tends to get too deep too fast for my liking, and partly because I'm kind of rusty at being analytical, and people use references that I don't know anything about, so a lot of it goes over my head and I'm left feeling really stupid and completely disconnected.
What I am curious about is this: from what I've noticed, most character death is used to either further plot, give the main character(s) fuel for angst and/or characterization, or both. So where does it cross the line from necessary character death to sexism? Is it sexist for any female character to die? How are the characters supposed to react to her death, or the death of any character, so that said death isn't just a catalyst for character development or a larger plot point? When is a dead woman not a woman in a refrigerator? Is a dead man ever a "man in a refrigerator"? Does this make me a bad feminist/woman/'intellectual'/person for not understanding it right away? And why can't I seem to ever spell refrigerator right the first time around?
Now, I am not saying that I disagree with this. I don't tend to really dwell on issues like this, partly because it tends to get too deep too fast for my liking, and partly because I'm kind of rusty at being analytical, and people use references that I don't know anything about, so a lot of it goes over my head and I'm left feeling really stupid and completely disconnected.
What I am curious about is this: from what I've noticed, most character death is used to either further plot, give the main character(s) fuel for angst and/or characterization, or both. So where does it cross the line from necessary character death to sexism? Is it sexist for any female character to die? How are the characters supposed to react to her death, or the death of any character, so that said death isn't just a catalyst for character development or a larger plot point? When is a dead woman not a woman in a refrigerator? Is a dead man ever a "man in a refrigerator"? Does this make me a bad feminist/woman/'intellectual'/person for not understanding it right away? And why can't I seem to ever spell refrigerator right the first time around?
Tags:
From:
no subject
The 'Women in Refrigerator' phenomenon is just a description for the tendency for writers to use the suffering of the female characters to generate an instant sympathy from the readers, and the relatively large proportion of female characters suffer death, maimings, rape, etc. It's NOT possible to say 'This is a Women in the Refrigerator death, but this other one isn't', because, as Gail Simone, who coined the term in the first place, said: This isn't about assessing blame about an individual story or the treatment of an individual character and it's certainly not about personal attacks on the creators who kindly shared their thoughts on this phenomenon. It's about the trend, its meaning and relevance, if any. Plus, it's just fun to talk about refrigerators with dead people in them. I don't know why.
It's less an issue of sexism than it is of lazy writing. Killing off the protagonist's wife/daughter/girlfriend is a shortcut to pathos, one that many writers take. Sometimes the same effect is generated by killing off a male character (see also: the Brother rule), but for some reason the trend is for the female characters to suffer. Not sure why, although I'm sure someone who actually knew jack shit about psychology could tell you.
Now, there's a separate phenomenon, which is the 'cheap death': Killing off minor characters, male or female, to artificially generate a sense of danger or urgency. This one you have to sort of feel out to determine if it's what's going on, but you know it when you see it. See: Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows.
(and just for the record, Barrett dying off would NOT have had the same affect on the party. He's a different character, who has a different role in the group dynamic. There would be an affect of approximately equal magnitude, but it would be VERY different)
From:
no subject
So when is character death not lazy writing, then? Can you point out some examples so I know what to aim for and what to avoid?
From:
no subject
There is no hard-and-fast rule, but you know it when you read it. Something like Silver Surfer: Requiem, or the Little Cement Girl from Spider-Man: Reign are both good deaths, but the swarms of deaths of minor characters that got murdered in Infinite Crisis, or Bill Foster from Civil War just feel like worthless shock-deaths. Or, to use an example that may be more relevant to you, Cedric Diggory and Sirius Black(although neither of them were really AWESOME deaths) had better, more relevant deaths than...well, everyone who died in the last Harry Potter book.
A good rule is that if you're offing minor characters for no good reason beyond trying to make the bad guy seem dangerous, and leaving the main cast unscathed, it'll come across as artificial and forced.
From:
no subject
From:
no subject
It's not that a WiR just furthers a plot or gives the lead protagonist angst. It's hard to come up with a textbook definition with examples. But if the only way you can think of to give your lead male angst or a reason to go out and fight is to rape or murder his female loved ones... chances are pretty good she's a WiR. And it's not just that these aren't good motivators, it's that they're used so often. It's a common trope.
It's kind of a hard phenomenon to explain, because it doesn't often come up outside of comics and comics fandom.
From:
no subject
Maybe this just isn't sinking in, but what other purpose would a character death serve? It's kind of hard to keep a story going of you kill off the main character, and any other character deaths/tortures/rapes are going to be plot or angst devices, even if they're handled well. Are we just supposed to avoid character death altogether, like LKH, or only kill off men? Or am I being too paranoid about it?
From:
no subject
To harp some more, this is a really good example from the Girl Wonder site (http://girl-wonder.org/robin/projectgirlwonder.html). This is the female Robin, who is tortured and dies in unrealistic (http://girl-wonder.org/robin/robin130.jpg) and sexualized positions (http://girl-wonder.org/robin/catwoman35.jpg). She's posed like a centerfold-- and that is no way for a superhero (let alone a ROBIN) to die.
From:
no subject
:D
From:
no subject
From:
no subject